This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
LMU Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Articles
    • General
    • Student Notes & Comments
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • Symposia
  • search
  • X (formerly Twitter) (opens in a new tab)
  • Facebook (opens in a new tab)
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:16808/feed
Student Notes & Comments
Vol. 11, Issue 2, 2024April 12, 2024 EDT

Ethical Implications of Utilizing Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Legal Profession: A Cautionary Note on Potential Model Rules of Professional Conduct Violations

Rachel Schworer,
Model Rules of Professional ConductArtificial intelligenceGenerative artificial intelligenceEthicsChatGPTCompetenceCandor to the court
Photo by Igor Omilaev on Unsplash
LMU Law Review
Rachel Schworer, Ethical Implications of Utilizing Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Legal Profession: A Cautionary Note on Potential Model Rules of Professional Conduct Violations, 11 LMU Law Review 51 (2024).

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system