Vol. 13, Issue 3, 2026August 27, 2026 EDT
Judicial Evisceration and Judicial Nonengagement In Campaign Finance Disclosure and Reporting: Different Threats in the U.S. and Nigeria, Similar Outcomes
Judicial Evisceration and Judicial Nonengagement In Campaign Finance Disclosure and Reporting: Different Threats in the U.S. and Nigeria, Similar Outcomes
Campaign financeMandatory disclosureNonprofitsCitizens UnitedFirst AmendmentExacting scrutinyNigeriaJudicial enforcementNon-complianceDeregulation
Articles in Vol. 13, Issue 3, 2026
Vol. 13, Issue 3, 2026
- Bad Medicine: Covid-19, RFK Jr., and the Devolution Of Infectious Disease ResponseBrendan W. Williams
- Deemed Acceptance, Not Deemed Consent: Nonvoting Stakeholders and a Uniform Conspicuousness Standard for Opt-Out Third-Party ReleasesZach Cavagnaro
- Healing the Hallways: From Cuffs to Circles in K-12 School Discipline and Access to JusticeDanni Bian
- Judicial Evisceration and Judicial Nonengagement In Campaign Finance Disclosure and Reporting: Different Threats in the U.S. and Nigeria, Similar OutcomesAyodele Babalola
- Procedural Due Process and Pretrial DetentionTyler Foster
- Subjective Justice: Judicial Ideology, Race, and the Fragility of Constitutional RightsWesley Harris
- Strict Scrutiny and the Viewpoint ContinuumA.G. Harmon
- The Last Defense of Due Process and Equal Protection: Reasserting the Senate’s Confirmation Power to Preserve the Legitimacy of The Supreme Court and Protect Constitutional RightsWesley Harris
Ayodele Babalola, Judicial Evisceration and Judicial Nonengagement In Campaign Finance Disclosure and Reporting: Different Threats in the U.S. and Nigeria, Similar Outcomes, 13 LMU Law Review 113 (2026).